Normally, internal storage devices such as hard drives and SSD disks are connected to the computer via the SATA interface, which allows to transfer data up to 6 Gbit/Sec.On the other hand, external storage devices may be connected via a number of different hardware interfaces including the Universal Serial Bus (USB), Firewire, the Thunderboltinterface, etc. USB 3.0 increased the maximum transfer speed approximately ten times allowing to transfer data up to 5 Gbit/Sec and making the USB bus very useful for connectingexternal storage devices. The purpose of this review is to compare the performance of SATA3 vs. USB3 hardware interfaces with two identical SSD disks connected to the same computer.
Since USB 2.0 is a LOT slower than USB 3.0, your PC and external hard drive will transfer files back and forth at a relative snail's pace. Bottom line: You'll be able to use your old USB hub to connect your new external hard drive to your PC with no problems at all as long as you can live with it transferring data at the much slower USB 2.0. Jan 01, 2021 And since it's an external drive, this information is then passed along via USB to the main hard drive for further action. But are external hard drives good for gaming? The answer depends on the type you choose. Our list contains a number of powerful external hard drives that are outfitted with USB 3.0 and 3.1 for lightning-quick transfer rates. Search Newegg.com for external usb 3 hard drive. Get fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Seagate Game Drive For Xbox 2TB External Hard Drive Portable HDD, USB 3.0 – White, Designed For Xbox One, 1 Month Xbox Game Pass Membership, 1 year Rescue Service (STEA2000417) 4.8 out of 5 stars 24,720. TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 USB Device - Driver Download. Vendor:. Product: TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 USB Device. Hardware Class: hdc.
For this performance review we have performed a number of different file copy, file synchronization, directory scanning, file search, disk space analysis, file classification,duplicate files search and file delete performance tests using the following three different sets of files: small files, medium-sized files and large files. Live tv for pc windows 7. All tests were performedon exactly the same hardware platform, in the same order using the same sets of files using two identical SSD disks connected via the SATA3 and USB3 interfaces.
Test Server Hardware Configuration
- Intel Xeon Quad-Core CPU
- 16 GB of system memory
- Samsung 850 PRO 512 GB SSD connected to SATA3
- Samsung 850 PRO 512 GB SSD connected to USB3
Test Data Sets
- Small Files - 100,000 files with the average file size of 32 KB
- Medium-Sized Files - 10,000 files with the average file size of 4 MB
- Large Files - 1000 files with the average file size of 64 MB
Performance Tests
- File Copy
- File Synchronization
- Disk Space Analysis
- Duplicate Files Search
- File Classification
- File Delete
Best Usb 3 Hard Drives
All benchmarks were performed using DiskBoss v7.4 (64-Bit version),which is capable of performing different types of disk space analysis, file copy, file synchronization, file search andfile delete operations. For all tested configurations, each test was performed 4 times using 1, 2, 3 and 4 parallel threads.
When copying small files to/from an external USB3 SSD disk, the average file copy performance reaches 66 MB/sec for a single file copy thread andscales to 126 MB/sec for 4 parallel file copy threads. On the other hand, when copying the same set of small files to/from the same SSD disk connectedvia the SATA3 interface, the average file copy performance reaches 74 MB/sec for a single file copy thread and scales to 158 MB/sec for 4 parallel file copy threads.
When copying medium-sized files to/from an external USB3 SSD disk, the average file copy performance reaches 134 MB/sec for a single file copy threadand scales to 320 MB/sec for 4 parallel file copy threads. On the other hand, when copying the same set of medium-sized files to/from the same SSD diskconnected via the SATA3 interface, the average file copy performance reaches 170 MB/sec for a single file copy thread and scales to 526 MB/sec for 4 parallel file copy threads.
Cheap External Hard Drive
According to our performance tests, for file copy operations the SATA3 interface delivers an approximate 30% performance improvement over the USB3 interfaceand the performance improvement is more pronounced when copying large files using a number of parallel file copy threads making the SATA3 interface morescalable for I/O intensive applications.
When scanning and analyzing directories, the performance of an external SSD disk connected via the USB3 interface reaches 50,000 Files/Sec for a single analysisthread and scales to 80,000 Files/Sec when scanning directories and analyzing files using 4 parallel processing threads.
When scanning and analyzing the same set of files stored on the same SSD disk connected via the SATA3 interface, the performance of disk space analysis operationsreaches the same 50,000 Files/Sec for a single analysis thread, slightly improves for 2 and 3 parallel processing threads and then scales to the same 80,000 Files/Secwhen scanning directories and analyzing files using 4 parallel processing threads, resulting in a minor 3% performance improvement over the performance delivered by the USB3 interface.
When searching duplicate files, the performance of an external SSD disk connected via the USB3 interface reaches 6,800 Files/Sec for a single processing thread and scalesto 21,300 Files/Sec when searching duplicate files using 4 parallel processing threads.
When searching the same set of duplicate files stored on the same SSD disk connected via the SATA3 interface, the performance of duplicate files search operationsreaches 7,100 Files/Sec for a single processing thread and scales to 21,600 Files/Sec when searching duplicate files using 4 parallel processing threads, resultingin a very small 2% performance improvement over the performance delivered by the USB3 interface.
When deleting files from an external SSD disk connected via the USB3 interface, the performance of file delete operations reaches 15,800 Files/Sec for a single filedelete thread and scales to 32,100 Files/Sec when deleting files using 4 parallel processing threads.
When deleting the same set of files from the same SSD disk connected via the SATA3 interface, the performance of file delete operations reaches 17,100 Files/Sec fora single file delete thread and scales to 32,800 Files/Sec when deleting files using 4 parallel processing threads, resulting in a 6% performance improvement overthe performance delivered by the USB3 interface.
Finally, in order to be able to easily compare the USB3 interface to the SATA3 interface for all types of file management operations, we have averaged and normalizedall performance results and calculated average performance improvements of the SATA3 interface over the USB3 interface.
According to the average performance results for all types of file management and analysis operations, the SATA3 interface is approximately 30% faster for file copyoperations, 6% faster for file delete operations and almost identical to the USB3 interface for all types of analysis and file search operations.
* This review was prepared for information purposes only and we strongly recommend to test the performance of the DiskBoss file management toolkit on your specifichardware platform and with your specific data sets.